Hi folks
I know this question.....
http://forums.sailsite.co.uk/viewtopic. ... ooted#p730
...has already been asked, but as it was not answered at the time I wonder if anyone would mind giving me their thoughts on it now please.
I have bought the boat in question and I'm wondering if, looking at online photos (as few as they are!) if the sail should indeed normally have a bolt rope along the foot whereas mine is loose footed, rather like a Mirror mainsail.
It's not really a big deal as such, but it would be nice to try to get it as close to the original intention as possible. It will be easy enough to get my local sailmaker to fit a bolt rope if that's what it should have.
Or maybe like so many things with the Otter, they all vary a bit ??
Thanks
Mainsail Foot
Moderator: aptanet
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:00 am
- Location: West Norfolk
Re: Mainsail Foot
Well, I have what appear to be the original spars (and perhaps sails) for 158.
Main has bolt-rope at tack and foot and boom has slot to accomodate the latter.
Sorry for tardy reply!!
Main has bolt-rope at tack and foot and boom has slot to accomodate the latter.
Sorry for tardy reply!!
Re: Mainsail Foot
ok thanks for your reply Albacore. Much appreciated. Not "tardy" at all
Re: Mainsail Foot
Hey, my Otter has a bolt rope going along the foot of the sail which feeds into the boom, however I am unaware of the benefits and drawbacks of having it like this or open footed.
hope this helps,
Jacob
hope this helps,
Jacob
- Attachments
-
- Otter.jpg (87.63 KiB) Viewed 12937 times
Re: Mainsail Foot
Hi Jacob
Thanks for your post.
It does seem from talking to people that both kinds of setup are out there in use on Otters. Mine is loose footed, as in there is no bolt rope. The tack of the mainsail (the rear corner of the foot) slots into the boom and slides to the back of the boom but the foot of the sail between the tack and the clew at the front is just "free".
From what people tell me (not personal experience though) they each have advantages and disadvantages. I gather that a loose foot allows more control over sail shape and reduces wear (no bolt rope sleeving to chafe in the boom track.
BUT having a bolt rope tends to make the sail much quieter in windier weather because the sail can't flap against the boom like an open foot does.
Like I say, that's only what people tell me. I'm no expert. Other boats I've been in have mostly been with a bolt rope fitted, like yours (except for my brother's Mirror which is loose footed like my Otter).
Initially I wondered if there was a "correct" setup, but it seems there's no right or wrong way for the Otter sails. The differences are probably very slight anyway.
Thanks again for sharing info about yours.
Cheers
Neal
Thanks for your post.
It does seem from talking to people that both kinds of setup are out there in use on Otters. Mine is loose footed, as in there is no bolt rope. The tack of the mainsail (the rear corner of the foot) slots into the boom and slides to the back of the boom but the foot of the sail between the tack and the clew at the front is just "free".
From what people tell me (not personal experience though) they each have advantages and disadvantages. I gather that a loose foot allows more control over sail shape and reduces wear (no bolt rope sleeving to chafe in the boom track.
BUT having a bolt rope tends to make the sail much quieter in windier weather because the sail can't flap against the boom like an open foot does.
Like I say, that's only what people tell me. I'm no expert. Other boats I've been in have mostly been with a bolt rope fitted, like yours (except for my brother's Mirror which is loose footed like my Otter).
Initially I wondered if there was a "correct" setup, but it seems there's no right or wrong way for the Otter sails. The differences are probably very slight anyway.
Thanks again for sharing info about yours.
Cheers
Neal